Loading…
Rauschenberg discusses one of his most controversial works. For more on this the significance of this painting, be sure to check out Geoff Sirc's book -English Composition as a Happening-
Rating: 
Tags: robert rauschenberg , robert rauschenberg interview
Views: 1207
Favorite of 2 people
4 Comments
Add a Comment
Report an Issue | Feedback |
Subscribe |
Distributors |
About us |
Jobs |
FAQs |
Contact us |
Links |
Advertise
Terms and Conditions |
Privacy Policy |
User Material
"He told Rauschenberg: 'I know what you're doing.'
De Kooning was referring, in part, to Rauschenberg's recent monochromatic work without imagery. But de Kooning was doubtless aware of the many other implications of Rauschenberg's request. The young artist was engaged in a symbolic act of generational and Oedipal murder, at once comic and deadly serious. He was ridding himself of a burdensome father. He was doing so, moreover, in the joking language of Dada, a movement that did not respect the sanctity of the art object or celebrate the romantic passion of de Kooning's generation. He was declaring that, for ambitious art, de Kooning stood in the way. He must be erased. Rauschenberg's errand had little charm for a middle-aged painter who had spent decades struggling to escape Picasso's shadow. Wasn't he, de Kooning, the emerging artist? To date, de Kooning had enjoyed only three or four years of modest recognition and was still trying to make ends meet. Now, his moment having just arrived, he found a young artist at his door anxious to announce the death of the old man -- and lampoon collectors for their desire to own "a de Kooning."