Reviews

ArtReview magazine

Phantom Sightings: Art After the Chicano Movement

Issue 24, July/ August 2008

Los Angeles County Museum of Art
6 April - 1 September

Review by Holly Myers

Phantom Sightings: Art After the Chicano Movement opens with a selfdeprecating curatorial wink: a 1972 photograph by the collective Asco, depicting an exterior wall of LACMA surreptitiously tagged with the names of three of Asco's artists. Conceived in response to a comment by a LACMA curator that Chicanos didn't make ‘fine art’, only folk art and graffiti, the stunt was a marvellously sardonic gesture that Asco member Harry Gamboa Jr, referred to as ‘the first conceptual work of Chicano art to be exhibited at LACMA’. It is a fitting epigraph for an exhibition distinguished in large part by the conceptual sophistication of its dozenplus artists, most of whom were still in the nursery when Asco was formed. Indeed, the show is, in many ways, the fulfilment of what Asco anticipated in the piece: a generation of Chicano art (or more neutrally, art by Americans of Mexican descent) that embraces the strategies and histories of the mainstream artworld without denying the particularity (and value) of its own socioeconomic circumstances; that demands the attention of the institution without, ultimately, being contained by it.

No one is more wary of the dangers in mounting a ‘surnamebased exhibition’ than the curators themselves (Rita Gonzalez, Howard Fox and Chon Noriega), whose introduction to the catalogue reads like a tentative contract reached after a long night of tense negotiations. They don't claim to represent all of Chicano art, to redress all past grievances, to resolve the issue of Chicano art's underrepresentation in mainstream institutions or even to speak for all of the artists in the show when claiming the designation. Indeed, they tread lightly around the very term, evident in the coy use of the word ‘after’ in the show's title. But in the uneasy silence that seems to have followed the closing of the ‘identity politics’ chapter of contemporary art history – a silence that, in a more cynical frame of mind, might be mistaken for a collective sigh of relief on the part of white male heterosexual artists, curators and critics everywhere – certain sociological facts persist, as does the more general question of art's relationship to its racial and cultural conditions of production.

It's to the credit of the curators that, but for this bit of public handwringing, they surrender most of the big questions to the artists themselves, who tackle them with great curiosity, humour and intelligence: Juan Capistran's photographs of himself breakdancing on what might be a Carl Andre sculpture; Carlee Fernandez's self-portraits in the guise of her father and other male role models; Margarita Cabrera's sculptures of agave plants made from the fabric of old US Border Patrol agent uniforms; Rubén Ortiz Torres's minimalist monochromes made with custom car paint; Ruben Ochoa's installation of a freeway mural he mounted last year in East LA, its backside still caked with glue and concrete; Alejandro Diaz's wonderfully droll hand-printed signs, originally hawked along New York’s Fifth Avenue (‘Make Tacos Not War’, ‘Mexicans Without Borders’) – these are smart, extremely canny works that, Chicano or no (but certainly not in spite of being Chicano), speak to the supreme importance of the artist's attention to his or her own surroundings.

Reply to This

Sign In/Up

Welcome to artreview.com


 
Receive the AR:Live Newsletter GO

Latest Activity

Anna Jaros Anna Jaros left a comment for Rieja van Aart 4 minutes ago
Fabián H. Ríos Rubino and artreview.com are now friends22 minutes ago
Fabián H. Ríos Rubino artreview.com
HOLLANDER HOLLANDER commented on the photo still014 32 minutes ago
Are we not speaking your language? Translate this page: